Locations in cities G-R: (not counting Los Angeles): 28. Covered here: 27.
Patients who feel a need to file a complaint:
How to File a Complaint with the California Medical Board
Affiliate: Mar Monte
(covers mid-California and northern Nevada)
Winchester
Article in Monterey County Weekly
A former employee sues Planned Parenthood, alleging retaliation for speaking up about harassment
by Mary Duan, October 31, 2019
Excerpt:
The woman once responsible for cultivating donors and bringing in major cash contributions to the largest Planned Parenthood affiliate in the country has sued her former employer, alleging the organization mishandled a sexual harassment and assault claim brought by another employee, then fired her when she repeatedly expressed her concerns about it.
Elizabeth Winchester says she was fired in late 2018 from the job she held at Planned Parenthood Mar Monte after she twice complained to her supervisor and CEO Stacy Cross about how they were handling the harassment and assault complaint. In her suit, filed Oct. 10 in Monterey County Superior Court, Winchester says Planned Parenthood issued her a “final written warning for alleged professional misconduct” after her second complaint, which she made on Oct. 24, 2018, and that her subsequent firing was in retaliation.
Winchester
Article in Monterey County Weekly
A former employee sues Planned Parenthood, alleging retaliation for speaking up about harassment
by Mary Duan, October 31, 2019
Excerpt:
Winchester also alleges Planned Parenthood Mar Monte violated state labor codes, requiring her to work extra hours without paying her overtime and failing to provide her both required rest breaks and required meal breaks. The suit also claims that upon her firing, Planned Parenthood failed to pay her all past due wages.
Gilroy
Document:
Highlights:
A patient had a relative working at the clinic. She told a staff member that she didn’t want this relative to know about her visit. However, the staff member went against the patient’s wishes and told the relative not only about the visit, but also personal health information, including the confidential results of the patient’s test.
CA Gilroy Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Gilroy Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Gilroy Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Gilroy Yelp 1
CA Gilroy Yelp 2
CA Gilroy Yelp 3
CA Gilroy Yelp 4
CA Gilroy Yelp 5
Glendora
CA Glendora Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Glendora Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Glendora Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Glendora Yelp 1
Hayward
Article from The San Francisco Chronicle:
Monty Patterson learns about RU-486 the hard way
Julian Guthrie,
Excerpt:
It was just after 9 a.m. on Sept. 17, 2003, when Monty Patterson got the call from the hospital. His daughter was in intensive care, and Patterson, a construction supervisor working on a home in the Oakland hills, was told to hurry.
At ValleyCare Medical Center in Pleasanton, Patterson, a divorced dad, was informed that Holly, who had turned 18 three weeks earlier, had an infection from an “incomplete abortion.” The doctor said Holly had taken the abortion pill Sept. 10, and was in septic shock . . .
Efforts to save the vivacious teenager with the blond hair and bright blue eyes failed. She died shortly before 2 p.m.
Article from Huffpost:
Monty Patterson Critical of Planned Parenthood’s Practices After Daughter’s Death
by Carly Schwartz, December 6, 2011
On September 17, 2003, Monty Patterson rushed to ValleyCare Medical Center in Pleasanton, Calif., where his 18-year-old daughter, Holly, was suffering from septic shock brought on by a medical abortion. Five hours later, Holly was dead . . .
Holly had visited a Planned Parenthood center a week earlier seeking RU-486 — a medical abortion pill — but the center did not follow FDA guidelines when administering the medication. As a result, Holly died from a severe infection brought on by an incomplete abortion . . .
After extensive research, Patterson claimed that it was not only the medication that killed her, but also what he believes to be its improper application, as directed by the Planned Parenthood center that Holly visited. And according to Patterson, this practice is dangerously common. In his research, he claims to have uncovered other previously unreported deaths linked to the pill.
CA Hayward Indeed 1
CA Hayward Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Hayward Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Hayward Yelp 1
CA Hayward Yelp 2
CA Hayward Yelp 3
Hemet
Google Reviews (not found) / Yelp Reviews
CA Hemet Yelp 1
CA Hemet Yelp 2
CA Hemet Yelp 3
CA Hemet Yelp 4
Huntington Park
Google Reviews (not found) / Yelp Reviews
CA Huntington Park Yelp 1
CA Huntington Park Yelp 2
Inglewood
Google reviews (not found) / Yelp Reviews
CA Ingraham Yelp 1
CA Ingraham Yelp 2
CA Ingraham Yelp 3
CA Ingraham Yelp 4
Koreatown
CA Koreatown Yelp 1
CA Koreatown Yelp 2
Lakewood
CA Lakewood Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lakewood Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lakewood Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lakewood Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lakewood Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lakewood Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lakewood Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lakewood Yelp 1
CA Lakewood Yelp 2
CA Lakewood Yelp 3
CA Lakewood Yelp 4
CA Lakewood Yelp 5
CA Lakewood Yelp 6
CA Lakewood Yelp 7
CA Lakewood Yelp 8
CA Lakewood Yelp 9
CA Lakewood Yelp 10
CA Lakewood Yelp 11
CA Lakewood Yelp 12
CA Lakewood Yelp 13
CA Lakewood Yelp 14
CA Lakewood Yelp 15
CA Lakewood Yelp 16
CA Lakewood Yelp 17
CA Lakewood Yelp 18
CA Lakewood Yelp 19
CA Lakewood Yelp 20
CA Lakewood Yelp 21
CA Lakewood Yelp 22
CA Lakewood Yelp 23
CA Lakewood Yelp 24
CA Lakewood Yelp 25
Lawndale
South Bay
CA Lawndale Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 9. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 10. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 11. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 12. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 13. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 14. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Google 15. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Lawndale Yelp 1
CA Lawndale Yelp 2
CA Lawndale Yelp 3
CA Lawndale Yelp 4
CA Lawndale Yelp 5
CA Lawndale Yelp 6
Long Beach
This location is in two different suites at the same address and accounted as two centers.
Castillo
CA Los Long Beach Castillo Malpractice Complaint
- From at least May 2023, Plaintiff . .. sought a consultation for vasectomy from PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES and its agents and employees.
- On May 20, 2023, Plaintiff . . . underwent a vasectomy . . .
- On March 25, 2024, Plaintiff . . . was diagnosed with epididymo-orchitis.
- On July 22, 2024, Plaintiff . . . was required to undergo a Left Epidimectomy & Right Orchiectomy as a result of his diagnosis of epididymo-orchitis.
- Defendant . . . so negligently failed to exercise the proper degree of knowledge and skill in examining, diagnosing, treating and caring for, Plaintiff . . . that he sustained severe and excruciating bilateral testicular pain, persistent and terrible physical pain, emotional pain and suffering, trauma, sickness, dread, fright, and shock. Additionally, he has incurred economic damages including, but not limited to medical expenses, loss of income, loss of future income, out of pocket expenses and non-economic damages, including excruciating physical and emotional pain, suffering, agony, stress, torment, fear, sleeplessness and devastation.
From the California Department of Public Health website:
Suite 260: CA Long Beach Ste 260 complaints
Suite 370: CA Long Beach Ste 370 complaints
CA Long Beach Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Google 9. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Google 10. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Google 11. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Long Beach Yelp 1
CA Long Beach Yelp 2
CA Long Beach Yelp 3
CA Long Beach Yelp 4
CA Long Beach Yelp 5
CA Long Beach Yelp 6
CA Long Beach Yelp 7
Madera
CA Madera Yelp 1
CA Madera Yelp 2
CA Madera Yelp 3
Manteca
Google reviews / Yelp reviews
CA Manteca Yelp 1
CA Manteca Yelp 2
CA Manteca Yelp 3
CA Manteca Yelp 4
CA Manteca Yelp 5
CA Manteca Yelp 6
Merced
See this center’s Better Business Bureau page for complaints and reviews
CA Merced Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Merced Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Merced Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Merced Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Merced Yelp 1
CA Merced Yelp 2
CA Merced Yelp 3
CA Merced Yelp 4
CA Merced Yelp 5
CA Merced Yelp 6
Mission Viejo
The Better Business Bureau webpage lists this center under “did not disclose” and states: “This charitable organization either has not responded to written BBB requests for information or has declined to be evaluated in relation to BBB Standards for Charity Accountability.”
CA Mission Viejo Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Mission Viejo Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Mission Viejo Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
Mission Viejo Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Mission Viejo Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Mission Viejo Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Mission Viejo Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Mission Viejo Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Mission Viejo Yelp 1
CA Mission Viejo Yelp 2
CA Mission Viejo Yelp 3
Modesto
See this center’s Better Business Bureau page for complaints and reviews
From the California Department of Public Health website:
Complaint filed –
02/14/2025 State Monitoring Unintentional Breach outside facility/hc system
Substantiated without deficiencies
(details of case not given – this is a list)
Indeed.com Planned Parenthood Employee Reviews for Modesto
CA Modesto Indeed 1
CA Modesto Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Modesto Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Modesto Google 3. Accessed 04.14.23
CA Modesto Yelp 1
CA Modesto Yelp 2
CA Modesto Yelp 3
CA Modesto Yelp 4
CA Modesto Yelp 5
CA Modesto Yelp 6
CA Modesto Yelp 7
CA Modesto Yelp 8
Moreno Valley
Documents:
Highlights:
Two patients were tested for STDs. Patient A was sent Patient B’s results, and Patient B was sent Patient A’s results. Included in the letters were the wrong patient’s name, address, and documentation of a positive chlamydia test.
CA Moreno Valley Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Moreno Valley Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Moreno Valley Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Moreno Valley Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Moreno Valley Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Moreno Valley Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Moreno Valley Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Moreno Valley Yelp 1
Mountain View
CA Mountain View Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Mountain View Google 2. Accessed 04.24.23.
CA Mountain View Google 3. Accessed 04.24.23.
CA Mountain View Yelp 1
CA Mountain View Yelp 2
CA Mountain View Yelp 3
CA Mountain View Yelp 2
Napa
Document:
Highlights:
A patient said a receptionist had breached her confidentiality by letting her cousin know she was pregnant.
CA Napa Google 1.
CA Napa Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Napa Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Napa Yelp 1
North Highlands
See this center’s Better Business Bureau page for complaints and reviews
Indeed.com Planned Parenthood Employee Reviews for North Highlands, CA
CA North Highlands Indeed 1
C
A North Highlands Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA North Highlands Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA North Highlands Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA North Highlands Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA North Highlands Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA North Highlands Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA North Highlands Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA North Highlands Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA North Highlands Google 9. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA North Highlands Google 10. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA North Highlands Yelp 1
CA North Highlands Yelp 2
CA North Highlands Yelp 3
CA North Highlands Yelp 4
Oakland
East
CA Oakland East Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Oakland East Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Oakland East Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Oakland East Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Oakland East Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Oakland East Google 6. Accessed 04.24.23.
CA Oakland East Yelp 1
CA Oakland East Yelp 2
CA Oakland East Yelp 3
CA Oakland East Yelp 4
Orange
February 22, 2013:
May 9, 2013:
‘
January 16, 2021:
February 13, 2021:
April 5, 2024
May 31, 2024
Part 1: staff calls and talks to 911
Part 2: call was accidental
911 CA Orange 05.31.24 transcript of both calls
Excerpt, Part 1:
After questions from the dispatcher weren’t answered by the worker who called, the manager came on the line:
Planned Parenthood Manager: Can I help you?
Fire Department Operator: Hi, this is the Orange Fire Department. We just have to confirm about how far along she was so in our response we know what to send from the paramedics’ end.
Planned Parenthood Manager: You just need to send the paramedics. They’ve come here many times before.
Fire Department Operator: They’re on their way. First trimester? Second trimester?
Planned Parenthood Manager: First trimester. She’s lost some blood. We would like to transfer her, please.
Fire Department Operator: I understand. Help is already on the way, but I explained to –
Planned Parenthood Manager: Thank you!
Fire Department Operator: – the first person I need some more information. So we are on our way to –
Planned Parenthood Manager: This is not typical for you guys to ask so many questions. That’s why we’re kind of concerned.
Fire Department Operator: It’s absolutely typical. This is our –
Planned Parenthood Manager: No, it’s not. I’ve had, I’ve done this before.
Fire Department Operator: Allow me to do my job, okay? We’re on our way. Just have her medication information available, and if anything changes –
Planned Parenthood Manager: We have everything ready.
Fire Department Operator: – just call me back,
Planned Parenthood Manager: we know what to do.
Fire Department Operator: Okay?
Planned Parenthood Manager: Okay, thank you.
Fire Department Operator:: Thank you so much. Bye bye.
Excerpt, Part 2:
9-1-1 Operator: 9 1 1. Emergency. Do you need police fire or –
Planned Parenthood Worker: If she did, she said it really softly –
9-1-1 Operator: Hello? 9 1 1.
Planned Parenthood Manager: All you have to say, “Are you refusing to send an ambulance?”
9-1-1 Operator: Hello? Can you hear me?
Planned Parenthood Manager: and she said, “Yes,” and that’s a documented –
Planned Parenthood Manager: I’m sorry, can you hear me? This is 9 1 1.
2nd Planned Parenthood Manager: You just need to send –
2nd 9-1-1 Operator: Hello. Hello.
Planned Parenthood Worker: Like, if we called and they hung up –
2nd 9-1-1 Operator: Hello?
[Hung up]
Health Violation Document:
Highlights:
One patient suffered copious bleeding after surgery and was sent to the hospital to be treated for complications and blood loss. Staff failed to properly document the incident in their records.
A second patient also bled heavily after surgery. She was sent home with active bleeding after passing a large blood clot. She returned to the facility for further treatment. It was estimated from her hemoglobin level that she lost 720 ml of blood. The clinic failed to document the amount of blood loss in their records.
Documents:
Highlights (2014):
A staff member who was related to the father of a patient’s child (in other words, a relative of the patient’s current or former boyfriend/partner) accessed the patient’s chart on four separate occasions without authorization. The staff member also revealed the patient’s private health information to others. When questioned, the staff member acknowledged that she looked up the records out of “curiosity.”
On multiple occasions, patients were handed urine specimen cups with other patients’ names and dates of birth on them.
A physician’s assistant gave a patient another patient’s prescription, allowing the patient to see the other patient’s name and the medicine prescribed to her. The prescription also included the other patient’s phone number, address, and birth date.
A staff member handed a patient the wrong paperwork, revealing to her another patient’s name and birth date.
Three different times, staff handed a patient another patient’s Family Pact ID card, revealing the other patient’s name, date of birth, and ID number.
A patient asked for her records, and the printout included the records of another patient. This breach of privacy was especially serious because, in addition to name, date of birth, address, phone number, and medical history, it revealed part of the other patient’s social security number.
A patient was given the wrong login information for the clinic’s patient portal. This meant that she had full access to another patient’s records.
A staff member left a packet of papers with the personal information of multiple patients in the bathroom, where they were found and turned in by another patient. These papers contained names, phone numbers, addresses, and in one case, a social security number. Also revealed were income, date of last menstrual period, and family size of some patients. Any patient or staff in the clinic had access to this information, which was left unsecured and unattended.
The medical records of one patient were faxed to a stranger rather than the intended party. A staff member entered the wrong fax number. This constituted a breach of privacy.
Staff attempted to impede the investigation into the breach of privacy mentioned above about the patient portal. They refused to cooperate with investigators and wouldn’t grant them access to medical records as required by law.
Indeed.com Planned Parenthood Employee Reviews for Orange, CA
CA Orange Indeed 1
CA Orange Indeed 2
CA Orange Indeed 3
CA Orange Google 1. Accessed 04.24.23.
CA Orange Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Orange Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Orange Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
Oxnard
According to a May 12, 2025 press release, workers in this center’s affiliate voted to authorize a strike, though the date for the strike to start hasn’t yet been set. The press release:
Excerpt from the May 12, 2025 Press Release:
Frontline healthcare workers at Planned Parenthood California Central Coast (PPCCC) have voted to authorize a strike over management’s unfair labor practices and refusal to address the urgent short-staffing crisis. The workers overwhelmingly approved the strike with a 100% vote following months of failed negotiations and continued bad-faith bargaining by Planned Parenthood management . . .
Workers say that despite their dedication to the mission of Planned Parenthood, management refuses to invest in the staff who make that mission possible. Turnover has reached crisis levels, as experienced caregivers leave for higher-paying, more sustainable jobs. Staffing shortages are stretching the remaining workforce thin and putting patient care at risk.
Palmdale
Antelope Valley
From the California Department of Public Health website:
CA Palmdale Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Palmdale Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Palmdale Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Palmdale Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Palmdale Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Palmdale Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Palmdale Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Palmdale Yelp 1
CA Palmdale Yelp 2
CA Palmdale Yelp 3
CA Palmdale Yelp 4
CA Palmdale Yelp 5
CA Palmdale Yelp 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
Pasadena
Case 1: Chidinma
Court Document:
CA Los Angeles Chidinma Malpractice Complaint
Excerpt:
- Plaintiff was a patient receiving medical care from the Defendants. In March 2022, Plaintiff visited Defendants for a women’s wellness exam. During the examination, Plaintiff informed the Defendants that Plaintiff was having abnormally heavy vaginal bleeding. Plaintiff also complained that Plaintiff was suffering from headaches, hormonal imbalance and other related discomforts and abnormalities. Plaintiff further notified Defendants of spotting, bloating and the potential of a mass in her abdomen. Plaintiff requested an ultrasound and testing to be performed by Defendants. Defendants refused the request and informed Plaintiff that Plaintiff was suffering from common constipation.
- Plaintiff respectfully informed Defendants that her condition was more serious than constipation and again requested the ultrasound and/or other testing to be certain that nothing was wrong. Defendants refused the request and ensured Plaintiff that the diagnosis of constipation was accurate.
- Plaintiff also requested a referral to a specialist. Defendants also summarily denied such a request and again informed Plaintiff that nothing was wrong other than simple constipation.
- Plaintiff’s symptoms persisted for several months. Plaintiff reasonably relied upon Defendants’ diagnosis and increased her level of self-care with workouts and supplements. However, Plaintiff’s condition continued and worsened.
- In January 2023, Plaintiff returned to Defendants’ offices and insisted that Plaintiff be seen by a different doctor. Plaintiff again requested an ultrasound be performed. Plaintiff was informed for the first time that Defendants’ facility did not have ultrasound equipment.
- Plaintiff was examined by a different healthcare provider at Defendants’ facility who, after examining Plaintiff for less than a minute, informed Plaintiff that Plaintiff’s uterus was extremely expanded and that masses were certainly present and detectable during Plaintiff’s prior visit. Plaintiff was then referred to another clinic.
- Plaintiff broke down in tears and contacted Covered California from her car, while still on Defendants’ premises, to obtain Kaiser Permanente coverage.
- Plaintiff followed up with Kaiser and learned that Plaintiff did have a number of advanced fibroids that would have certainly been present and detectable in March 2022 when Plaintiff visited the Defendants’ facility, as set forth above. Furthermore, Plaintiff was advised that the fibroids were so large and advanced that Plaintiff’s reproductive health was at risk and that nonsurgical options which would have been available in March 2022, were no longer available.
- Plaintiff required surgery which was successfully performed by Kaiser and had a number of large, advanced and potentially dangerous fibroids removed. The fibroids were certainly present and detectable in March 2022. But for the Defendants’ conduct, Plaintiff would not have needed surgery and would not be at risk of infertility.
Article from Pasadena Now
Planned Parenthood Pasadena Sued Over Allegedly Wrong ‘Common Constipation’ Diagnosis
City News Service, August 22, 2023
Excerpt:
A former Planned Parenthood patient Monday sued the organization for medical malpractice, alleging she was incorrectly diagnosed with “common constipation” when she actually had serious issues that put her reproductive capability at risk . . .
Chidinma went to Planned Parenthood in March 2022 for a wellness exam and told her provider that she was having abnormally heavy vaginal bleeding, headaches, hormonal imbalance and other related discomforts and abnormalities, according to her suit . . .
Chidinma additionally told informed the provider that she had bloating and a possible mass in her abdomen, but was denied an ultrasound and told she had “common constipation,” the suit states.
Chidinma argued that her condition was more serious and again requested the ultrasound and equivalent testing, but she was again turned down . . .
Chidinma’s symptoms persisted for several months and worsened, so she returned to Planned Parenthood in January and asked again for an ultrasound, finding out for the first time that the facility did not have ultrasound equipment, the suit alleges.
Chidinma was granted a request to be examined by someone else and it took less than a minute for the new provider to diagnose that the plaintiff’s uterus was sharply expanded and that masses were present that could have been found during the March 2022 Planned Parenthood office visit, the suit states.
Chidinma cried and contacted her insurance carrier from her car to obtain coverage from a different provider organization and she learned during her visit to the new facility that she had fibroids so large and advanced that her reproductive health was at risk and that non-surgical options she had in March 2022 were no longer available, the suit states.
Case 2: Moulton
Court Document:
CA Pasadena Moulton Malpractice Complaint
Excerpt:
9. . . . on or about January 19, 2015, Plaintiff . . . underwent a procedure for the insertion of a Paragard T 380 Intrauterine device for birth control. Said medical procedure was performed in such a manner that fell below the applicable standard of care.
10. Such negligence has caused Plaintiff . . . to sustain what appears to be a life-long injury, thereby requiring medical intervention and the expenditure of monies in an attempt to somehow remedy the pain and suffering . . .
From the California Department of Public Health website:
Complaints filed –
two in 02.25.22 – Substantiated without deficiencies
three in 07.21.23 – Substantiated without deficiencies
one in 19.10.23 – No deficiencies noted
(details of cases not given – this is a list)
CA Pasadena Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Pasadena Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Pasadena Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Pasadena Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Pasadena Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Pasadena Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Pasadena Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Pasadena Yelp 1
CA Pasadena Yelp 2
CA Pasadena Yelp 3
CA Pasadena Yelp 4
Pomona
From the California Department of Public Health website:
Complaints filed –
two in 08.12.22 – Substantiated without deficiencies
one in 011.10.22 – No deficiencies noted
three in 01.10.24 –
State Monitoring Unintentional Breach outside facility/hc system
Substantiated without deficiencies
(details of cases not given – this is a list)
CA Pomona Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Pomona Google 2. Accessed 04.24.23.
CA Pomona Yelp 1
CA Pomona Yelp 2
Rancho Mirage
CA Rancho Mirage Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Rancho Mirage Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Rancho Mirage Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Rancho Mirage Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Rancho Mirage Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21
CA Rancho Mirage Yelp 1
CA Rancho Mirage Yelp 2
Redding
See this center’s Better Business Bureau page for complaints and reviews
CA Redding Google 1. Accessed 04.24.23.
CA Redding Google 2. Accessed 04.24.23.
CA Redding Yelp 1
CA Redding Yelp 2
Redwood City
From the California Department of Public Health website:
one complaint 06.12.24 and one 11.15.24, both:
Unintentional Bread outside the facility/hc system,
Substantiated without deficiencies
CA Redwood City Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Redwood City Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Redwood City Yelp 1
Richmond
Hilltop
CA Richmond Google 1. Accessed 04.24.23.
CA Richmond Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Richmond Yelp 1
Riverside
Flaster Family
See this center’s Better Business Bureau page for complaints and reviews
Goode
Article from The Los Angeles Times
Abortion procedure caused death of Riverside woman, lawsuit alleges
by Jonathan Abrams, June 21, 20017
Excerpt:
The mother of a Riverside woman who died of toxic shock syndrome after allegedly undergoing an abortion procedure at Planned Parenthood filed a malpractice suit against the organization and a Riverside County hospital this week.
The lawsuit alleges that . . . a nurse inserted cervical dilators, used to gradually expand the cervix in preparation for second-trimester abortions, despite the fact that Goode had a vaginal infection.
The dilators, which are shaped like small sticks and consist primarily of seaweed, became a conduit that spread the infection to the rest of her body, the lawsuit alleges.
Article from the Orange Register
Mother blames Riverside abortion procedure for daughter’s death
June 25, 2007
Excerpt:
“My daughter made a choice, but she didn’t choose to die,” Meloncon [her mother] said. “A lost dog gets more attention than my daughter did. This has really torn at my family.”
Planned Parenthood mailed two letters to Goode stating the dilators needed to be taken out, but Meloncon said the family never received the letters. The woman said Planned Parenthood should have been more aggressive in contacting her daughter . . .
With her condition deteriorating, Goode was taken to Riverside County Regional Medical Center in Moreno Valley on Feb. 4. A blood test confirmed Goode was pregnant, and Meloncon said she asked that a pelvic examination be performed.
But the hospital said it couldn’t perform one because Goode would not consent, the suit said.
“She was confused and disorientated,” Meloncon said. “It was totally out of character for what her behavior normally is.”
The hospital performed a pelvic examination Feb. 13 and found the dilators. Goode had a miscarriage that day and died the next, the lawsuit said.
Documents:
Highlights:
A staff member placed the wrong label on a health access program card, allowing a patient to see the name, date of birth, and the medical record number of another patient.
Lab results for a patient were mailed to the wrong address.
A male staff member accessed a female patient’s records without permission to obtain her cell phone number. He wanted it for his own “personal use.” The staff member then texted the patient and asked if he could continue to text her. The patient reported this breach of privacy and unwanted contact to the clinic.
CA Riverside Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 9. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 10. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 11. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 12. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 13. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Google 14. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Riverside Yelp 1
CA Riverside Yelp 2
CA Riverside Yelp 3
Roseville
See this center’s Better Business Bureau page for complaints and reviews
From the California Department of Public Health website:
05.07.24 – Unintentional Bread outside the facility/hc system,
Substantiated without deficiencies
Indeed.com Planned Parenthood Employee Reviews for Roseville, CA
CA Roseville Indeed 1
CA Roseville Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 9. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 10. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 11. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Roseville Google 12. Accessed 04.24.23.
CA Roseville Yelp 1
CA Roseville Yelp 2
CA Roseville Yelp 3
CA Roseville Yelp 4
CA Roseville Yelp 5
CA Roseville Yelp 6
