Locations for cities A-F: 25. Covered here: 25.
Patients who feel a need to file a complaint:
How to File a Complaint with the California Medical Board
For pdf reports on the state that can be posted online, sent by email attachment, or printed in whole or with specific pages:
California State Report Online PDF
California – Mar Monte Affiliate – Fresno, Sacramento, San Diego – Report Online PDF
Alhambra
Wang
Court Document:
CA Alhambra Wang 2016 Complaint
Excerpt:
1. In or around January 2015, Planned Parenthood hired Plaintiff as a Clinician. From the beginning . . . [R.M], a Medical Assistant . . . together with [E.H.], manager of the same office, engaged in a discriminatory campaign against Plaintiff solely on the basis of her color, race, ethnicity, and national origin (Asian/Chinese) as well as a known disability. Not only was Plaintiff forced to endure substantially unfavorable working conditions in comparison to the super-majority of Hispanic, Spanish-speaking employees, Plaintiff was terminated from her employment for complaining of such Labor Code violations . . .
25. . . . Plaintiff . . . complained . . . regarding Planned Parenthood’s failure and refusal to offer her the statutorily required meal periods and rest breaks . . . In so complaining, Plaintiff advised Planned Parenthood of her pre-diabetic condition/disability and her frustration with not being able to monitor and regulate her blood sugar levels . . . that the simple and reasonable accommodations or providing her with timely meal periods and rest periods would permit her to perform the essential functions of her job without materially and/or adversely affecting her health.
CA Alhambra Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Alhambra Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Alhambra Google 3. Accessed. 10.07.22.
CA Alhambra Google 4. Accessed. 10.07.22.
CA Alhambra Google 5. Accessed. 10.07.22.
CA Alhambra Yelp 1
CA Alhambra Yelp 2
CA Alhambra Yelp 3
CA Alhambra Yelp 4
CA Alhambra Yelp 5
CA Alhambra Yelp 6
CA Alhambra Yelp 7
CA Alhambra Yelp 8
CA Alhambra Yelp 9
Anaheim
Bible
Court Document:
CA Anaheim Bible 2020 Malpractice Complaint
Excerpt:
14. On or about July 24, 2019, Plaintiff went to get a test done at Defendant Planned Parenthood for a possible sexually transmitted disease believing it was going to only be a blood or urine test.
15. However, the provider employed by Defendant . . . insisted that Plaintiff had to be given a manual pelvic exam.
16. Plaintiff’s sister was prevented from going into the examination room with Plaintiff, though Plaintiff desired her presence.
17. Plaintiff told the provider that she did not want to have a manual pelvic exam, but Defendant . . . performed the exam anyway.
18. Plaintiff became very anxious and screamed telling Defendant . . ., “No!”
19. As a result of the forced manual pelvic exam, Plaintiff suffered emotional distress, anxiety and depression.
CA Anaheim Glassdoor 1
CA Anaheim Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Anaheim Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Anaheim Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Anaheim Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Anaheim Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Anaheim Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Anaheim Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Anaheim Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Anaheim Google 9. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Anaheim Google 10. Accessed 10.07.22.
CA Anaheim Yelp 1
Antioch
Health Violation Documents:
Highlights:
Clinic Conditions
Staff
Unlicensed and untrained staff were seeing patients and giving medical care.
Employees were counseling patients, giving medical advice, examining patients, and obtaining informed consent even though they were not qualified to do so.
The staff member who performed vaginal ultrasounds was untrained and unqualified, possessed only a high school diploma with one medical assistant class. According to the report “the performance of a transvaginal ultrasound is an invasive procedure which could potentially result in patient injury and poor quality ultrasound images.”
The medical director stated the only requirement in hiring an ultrasound technician was a high school diploma.
The head of ultrasound training wasn’t a certified ultrasound technician and had no training beyond his instructions at the clinic.
According to the medical director, all 20 clinics she supervised employed untrained ultrasound technicians who were merely certified as medical assistants. The director stated she felt medical assistants were qualified to do ultrasounds but was unable to give an example of a health care facility, other than her clinics, where they were doing so.
Incident
A woman suffered a severe complication, and the clinic failed to cooperate with investigators as to the incident. Surveyors were turned away twice and not permitted to inspect the facility. Clinic staff refused to allow inspectors access to the patient records, refused to allow inspectors entry into the facility, and when they did allow investigators access to electronic records, refused to let them make copies or take notes.
The patient later began bleeding heavily and passed large clots, one of which was the size of a baseball. She passed out and went to the hospital. The patient later said, “I could have died.” She needed surgery and a blood transfusion. Two units of blood were given.
The nurse who gave the patient medications wasn’t licensed to do so and failed to follow clinic protocol as to what medications to give her. She gave the patient three extra medications.
Other
Clinic protocols on administering medications didn’t include supervision by a doctor.
CA Antioch Glassdoor 1
CA Antioch Yelp 1
CA Antioch Yelp 2
CA Antioch Yelp 3
CA Antioch Yelp 4
Bakersfield
See this center’s Better Business Bureau page for complaints and reviews
CA Bakersfield Glassdoor 1
CA Bakersfield Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Bakersfield Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Bakersfield Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Bakersfield Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Bakersfield Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Bakersfield Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Bakersfield Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Bakersfield Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Bakersfield Google 9. Accessed 10.22.22
CA Bakersfield Google 10. Accessed 10.07.22.
CA Bakersfield Yelp 1
CA Bakersfield Yelp 2
CA Bakersfield Yelp 3
CA Bakersfield Yelp 4
CA Bakersfield Yelp 5
CA Bakersfield Yelp 6
Baldwin Park
From the California Department of Public Health website:
CA Baldwin Park List of Complaints
CA Baldwin Park Yelp 1
CA Baldwin Park Yelp 2
CA Baldwin Park Yelp 3
CA Baldwin Park Yelp 4
Burbank
Dentists Insurance Company
Court Document:
CA Burbank Dentists Insurance Company 2019 Complaint
Excerpt:
7. . . . on October 9, 2018, Plaintiff’s insured witnessed water flowing onto the premises from a toilet that had overflowed that was owned and controlled by Defendants, Planned Parenthood . . .
13. As a result of the negligence of Defendants and each of them, Plaintiff’s insured sustained at least $296,158.54 in damages.
Indeed.com Planned Parenthood Employee Reviews for Burbank, CA
CA Burbank Indeed 1
CA Burbank Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Burbank Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Burbank Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Burbank Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Burbank Yelp 1
CA Burbank Yelp 2
CA Burbank Yelp 3
CA Burbank Yelp 4
Canoga Park
Indeed.com Planned Parenthood Employee Reviews for Canoga Park, CA
CA Canoga Park Indeed 1
CA Canoga Park Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Canoga Park Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Canoga Park Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Canoga Park Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Canoga Park Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Canoga Park Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Canoga Park Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Canoga Park Yelp 1
CA Canoga Park Yelp 2
CA Canoga Park Yelp 3
CA Canoga Park Yelp 4
CA Canoga Park Yelp 5
CA Canoga Park Yelp 6
Carson
CA Carson Google 1. Accessed 04.13.23.
CA Carson Google 2. Accessed 04.13.23.
CA Carson Google 3. Accessed 04.13.23.
CA Carson Google 4. Accessed 04.13.23.
CA Carson Yelp 1
Chico
See this center’s Better Business Bureau page for complaints and reviews
Document:
Highlights:
A clinic employee looked up the private medical records of a patient without authorization. The patient was the ex-girlfriend of the man the employee was dating. The employee wanted to know details about the patient’s sexual health and history for personal reasons. She later stated that she wanted to know if the patient had an STD. The staff member who reported the violation said that the employee in question had the file open at her desk and was reading it “like a magazine.”
CA Chico Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chico Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chico Yelp 1
CA Chico Yelp 2
CA Chico Yelp 3
CA Chico Yelp 4
Chula Vista
Murray
Court Documents:
CA Chula Vista Murray 2014 Labor Complaint
Filed June 10, 2014. Settled: June 30, 2015
Excerpt:
Documents
CA Chula Vista 2013 Statement of Deficiencies
Highlights:
Clinic staff spoke openly and loudly about the reason a patient came to the clinic in a manner that allowed other patients to overhear, a breach of confidentiality.
Two patients with the same first name came to the clinic on the same day. One patient was mistakenly given the other patient’s receipt, which had confidential information including fees and services given and the patient’s address on it.
Indeed.com Planned Parenthood Employee Reviews in Chula Vista, CA
CA Chula Vista Indeed 1
CA Chula Vista Indeed 2
CA Chula Vista Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chula Vista Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chula Vista Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chula Vista Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chula Vista Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chula Vista Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chula Vista Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chula Vista Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chula Vista Google 9. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chula Vista Google 10. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Chula Vista Yelp 1
CA Chula Vista Yelp 2
CA Chula Vista Yelp 3
Clearlake
CA Clearlake Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
Coachella
Barron
Court Document:
CA San Diego Barron 2012 Disability Discrimination Complaint
Excerpt:
Document:
Highlights:
The clinic sent a notification of a positive chlamydia test to the wrong patient. The letter was mailed to one patient but was intended for another. One patient’s address was written on the outside of the envelope, but the letter inside was addressed to a different patient. The letter contained the patient’s name, personal details, and information about the STD. This was a breach of confidentiality.
CA Coachella Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Coachella Yelp 1
CA Coachella Yelp 2
CA Coachella Yelp 3
CA Coachella Yelp 4
CA Coachella Yelp 5
CA Coachella DocAsap 1
CA Coachella DocAsap 2
CA Coachella DocAsap 3
CA Coachella DocAsap 4
Compton
CA Compton Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Compton Yelp 1
CA Compton Yelp 2
CA Compton Yelp 3
CA Compton Yelp 4
CA Compton Yelp 5
Concord
Horde
Court Document:
CA Concord Horde 2005 Malpractice Complaint
Excerpt:
9. In April 2004, [Plaintiff] . . . began a regimen of Depo Provera hormone injections at Planned Parenthood . . .
10. [The] first injections was April 8, 2004. At that time, she gave a urine sample and was told she was not pregnant. She later found out she became pregnant sometime between June 1 and June 15, 2004, despite the Depo Provera injection.
11. On June 30, 2004 . . . She returned to Planned Parenthood and had a second Depo Provera injection. [She] gave a urine sample. Apparently, the urine sample was misread or disregarded because she was told she was not pregnant and was injected . . .
13. On August 21, 2004, [she] went to Planned Parenthood for her annual exam, and to find out if the vomiting and acid reflux were side effects of Depo Provera . . . She was told she was healthy and not pregnant. There was no explanation for the vomiting and acid reflux as these are not side effects of Depo Privera.
14. On September 21, 2004, when Horde was four months pregnant, she returned to Planned Parenthood for the scheduled Depo Provera injections. She gave a urine sample, which she believed was for pregnancy testing. She was injected and left . . . She thought she had a tumor because her abdomen was getting larger. Again, she was assured she was not pregnant because she was taking Depo Provera.
16. . . . She waited out the remainder of her pregnancy with great anxiety that the baby would be born with birth defects given she had two Depo Provera injections and prescribed medications for a peptic ulcer and acid reflux while she was pregnant.
17. Ms. Horde gave birth on March 28, 20015, to a healthy baby boy . . .
Health Violation Documents:
CA Concord 2023 complaint list
Highlights:
Staff sent two patients’ records, containing their medical histories, to the wrong hospitals.
Indeed.com Planned Parenthood Employee Reviews for Concord, CA
CA Concord Indeed 1
CA Concor Glassdoor 1
CA Concord Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Concord Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Concord Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Concord Yelp 1
CA Concord Yelp 2
CA Concord Yelp 3
CA Concord Yelp 4
CA Concord Yelp 5
CA Concord Yelp 6
CA Concord Yelp 7
Corona
CA Corona Indeed 1
CA Corona Indeed 2
Google reviews / Yelp reviews
CA Corona Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Corona Yelp 1
CA Corona Yelp 2
CA Corona Yelp 3
CA Corona Yelp 4
Costa Mesa
Fagan
Court Document:
CA Costa Mesa Fagan 2018 Malpractice Complaint
Excerpt:
-
- On March 30, 2015, Plaintiff presented for family planning services with Planned Parenthood at their office in Costa Mesa.
- Planned Parenthood’s doctor . . . implanted a Nexplanon birth control device in Plaintiff’s left arm.
- On February 15, 2017, Plaintiff presented for removal of the birth control device . . . Planned Parenthood’s employee . . . was unable to remove the implant. Plaintiff decided to leave the implant in for the time being because it was effective at controlling her ability to get pregnant despite confronting her with numerous unpleasant side effects . . .
- On August 14, 2017, Plaintiff against presented . . . for removal of the Nexplanon implant. [Defendant] was unable to remove it, however, because the implant rod palpated deep near Plaintiff’s bicep muscle. Dr. [Defendant] indicated Plaintiff would need to present again for surgical removal.
- On October 3, 2017, Plaintiff again presented with [Defendant] for removal of the implant.
- While [Defendant] was able to successfully remove the device, it was clear that the implant was improperly inserted by Planned Parenthood in 2015. It was too close to her bicep muscle and not placed in an area of benign skin tissue; instead, it was placed in an area that caused severe nerve and muscle damage . . .
- Because of the improper implantation of the Nexplanon device, Plaintiff suffers from permanent nerve damage and pain. Plaintiff is a yoga instructor and is unable to practice or teach yoga anymore because of the damage caused by the implant.
- Plaintiff has lost mobility and will suffer the effects of the improper implantation for the rest of her life.
CA Costa Mesa Indeed 1
CA Costa Mesa Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Costa Mesa Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Costa Mesa Google 3
Costa Mesa Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Costa Mesa Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Costa Mesa Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Costa Mesa Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Costa Mesa Yelp 1
CA Costa Mesa Yelp 2
CA Costa Mesa Yelp 3
CA Costa Mesa Yelp 4
El Cajon
Documents:
Highlights:
Indeed.com Planned Parenthood Employee Reviews for El Cajon, CA
CA El Cajon Indeed 1
CA El Cajon Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Cajon Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Cajon Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Cajon Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Cajon Yelp 1
CA El Cajon Yelp 2
CA El Cajon Yelp 3
El Centro
Imperial Valley Homan
CA El Centro Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Centro Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Centro Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Centro Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Centro Yelp 1
El Cerrito
Trujillo
Court Document:
CA El Cerrito Trujillo 2018 Malpractice Court Document
Excerpt:
Plaintiff’s complaint is based upon medical treatment that she received from defendants on January 26, 2017 . . . During that visit, plaintiff underwent an ultrasound and was told that she had an intrauterine pregnancy . . . As it turned out, however, plaintiff had an ectopic pregnancy, which required emergency surgery and hospitalization from January 30 to February 3, 2017 . . . She was then hospitalized again from February 4 to either the 8th or 11th.
CA El Cerrito Yelp 1
CA El Cerrito Yelp 2
El Monte
Document:
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Civil Rights
Health Information Privacy Complaint:
Screenshot
Complaint filed July 18, 2014
CA El Monte Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Monte Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Monte Google 3
CA El Monte Google 4
CA El Monte Google 5
CA El Monte Google 6
CA El Monte Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Monte Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Monte Google 9. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Monte Google 10. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA El Monte Yelp 1
CA El Monte Yelp 2
CA El Monte Yelp 3
CA El Monte Yelp 4
CA El Monte Yelp 5
Escondido
Documents:
CA Escondido complaints 2023 & 2024
Highlights:
A patient was given three medications that were intended for a different patient, posing a health risk for the patient.
A patient was emailed another patient’s personal medical information, including test results, medical history, diagnosis, and medications.
CA Escondido Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Escondido Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Escondido Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Escondido Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Escondido Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Escondido Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Escondido Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Escondido Yelp 1
CA Escondido Yelp 2
CA Escondido Yelp 3
CA Escondido Yelp 4
CA Escondido Yelp 5
Eureka
Note: Some reviews refer to having no place else to go. The Redwood Community Health Center is about half a mile away, does offer gynecological and family planning services according to its website, and so far has good Google reviews.
Indeed.com Planned Parenthood Employee Reviews for Eureka, CA
CA Eureka Indeed 1
CA Eureka Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Eureka Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Eureka Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Eureka Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Eureka Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Eureka Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Eureka Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Eureka Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Eureka Yelp 1
CA Eureka Yelp 2
CA Eureka Yelp 3
Fairfield
CA Fairfield Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fairfield Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fairfield Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fairfield Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fairfield Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fairfield Yelp 1
CA Fairfield Yelp 2
CA Fairfield Yelp 3
CA Fairfield Yelp 4
Fresno (entire city)
Article from the Fresno Bee:
‘Nowhere is safe.’ Women accuse ex-Planned Parenthood official of sexual harassment
by Mackenzie Mays, October 12, 2018
Excerpt:
For years, Pedro Elias was the face of Fresno’s branch of Planned Parenthood.
At news conferences and events, as the director of public affairs, he stood out in a sea of women advocating for reproductive rights: A muscular man often wearing a bright pink Planned Parenthood T-shirt.
But when his employment ended in September after working for the organization since 2000, his colleagues came forward to surmise why.
“He flaunted his advocacy for women while sexually harassing and assaulting multiple women for years,” said Sarah Hutchinson, policy director for ACT for Women and Girls in Visalia.
There are two centers in Fresno; these suits don’t specify which one.
Lupercio
Court Document:
CA Fresno Lupercio 2015 Malpractice Complaint
Excerpt – Description of Reason for Liability:
An intravaginal ultrasound was performed by defendant on plaintiff on 3/5/15. She was then informed that a viable pregnancy could be terminated by means of a chemical abortion on 3/6/15. However, the defendant failed to detect plaintiff’s ectopic or tubal pregnancy which was or should have been apparent on the ultrasound and for which a chemical abortion was unsafe and contraindicated. This conduct fell below the standard of care for the community and constitutes
negligence and medical malpractice directly causing plaintiff’s serious personal injuries, including permanent removal of her left fallopian tube.
Aoki
Court Document:
Excerpt:
Note: The complaint details several incidents in detail.
8. In or around August 20l2, Ms. Aoki was hired by Planned Parenthood as a Response Center Agent in Clovis, California . . .
9. Throughout Ms. Aoki‘s employment with Planned Parenthood, [E.R.] was head of the Planned Parenthood Response Center . . . From the beginning of Ms. Aoki’s employment with Planned Parenthood, Ms. Aoki regularly hear Planned Parenthood employees complain about [E.R.] because he yelled at employees, retaliated against employees who complained about him, and made disparaging remarks toward female employees . . .
18. Ms. Aoki understood [E.R.]’s regular reference to female employees as his “bitches” as sexual harassment . . .
18. . . . When Ms. Aoki encouraged the female coworkers to report [E.R.]’s sexist comments, the female coworkers told Ms. Aoki that [E.R.] had a close relationship with Human Resources and that nothing could be done to stop [E.R.]’s behavior . . .
21. After [E.R.] closed the door to his office, Ms. Aoki saw that he was visibly furious. [E.R.]’s hands were shaking and he was red in the face. Ms. Aoki was scared that [E.R.] was going to react violently to any complaints . . .
41. Ms. Aoki was terrified and on the verge of tears. Her supervisor had gotten in her face, nearly hit her, and screamed at her and all the other template specialists in an enraged and demeaning tone. After thinking about all of [E.R.]’s sexist comments as detailed above, Ms. Aoki feared [E.R.]’s repeated harassment and that he might physically assault her . . .
56. Between January 3 l, 2017 and February 2, 2017, Ms. Aoki heard from at least two co-workers that [E.R.] was showing Ms. Aoki’s resignation letter to other employees. [E.R.] also told employees that [two supervisors] told him that he “did not have anything to worry about.” [E.R.] was bragging about the fact that Planned Parenthood managers had ratified his harassing and retaliatory behavior.
61. To this day, Ms. Aoki has never received any information from Planned Parenthood about the results of this investigation or any investigation that Planned Parenthood made as a result of her Ms. Aoki’s complaints about [E.R.]’s sexual harassment and retaliation.
CA Fresno Indeed 1
CA Fresno Indeed 2
Fresno
Family First
Crowder
Court Document:
CA Fresno Crowder Malpractice Complaint
Excerpt:
- On or about January 29, 2016, Plaintiff underwent a skin biopsy of her right ankle at Defendant Family First Health Center, a subsidiary of Defendant Planned Parenthood Mar Monte . . .
- Shortly thereafter, Defendants provided Plaintiff with follow up treatment and antibiotics. Defendants told her any discomfort would resolve within a month or two.
- By May 16, 2016, Plaintiff had developed a severe infection in the area of the biopsy and went to the emergency room at St. Agnes hospital.
- At that time Plaintiff discovered she had developed a severe infection due to the negligent skin biopsy . . .
- As a direct and proximate result of the professional negligence of Defendants, and each of them, Plaintiff has suffered severe pain and suffering, severe emotional distress, loss of physical and mental stamina and acuity, and employability.
Document:
Highlights:
Staff put another patient’s label on a patient chart. Therefore, the patient saw another patient’s personal information, including her name and date of birth.
CA Fresno Family First Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fresno Family First Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fresno Family First Google 3. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fresno Family First Google 4. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fresno Family First Google 5. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fresno Family First Google 6. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fresno Family First Google 7. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fresno Family First Google 8. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fresno Family First Yelp 1
CA Fresno Family First Yelp 2
CA Fresno Family First Yelp 3
CA Fresno Family First Yelp 4
Fresno
Fulton
See this center’s Better Business Bureau page for complaints and reviews
From the California Department of Public Health website:
CA Fresno Fulton complaint 2024
Unintentional Breach outside facility, Substantiated without deficiencies
CA Fresno Fulton Google 1. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fresno Fulton Google 2. Accessed 06.07.21.
CA Fresno Fulton Yelp 1
CA Fresno Fulton Yelp 2
CA Fresno Fulton Yelp 3
CA Fresno Fulton Yelp 4
